Great players
deserve to go out with a bang but Ricky Ponting’s departure, following a
heavy defeat in a series in which he averaged just 6.40, was the
saddest of whimpers. The trademark swivel pull, once a stroke of
withering power, had long since become more of a reflex paddle, and his
footwork, once so sure, had become a shuffling, jumping mess. Where once
his arrival at the crease had bowlers full of trepidation he had become
a minor inconvenience to swat aside. For all that his many admirers
willed him to succeed he had failed to see the writing on the wall,
which by now was in pretty big letters, and the spinelessness of the
selectors in allowing him to pick his moment to retire meant that it was
always likely to end in tears.
In truth, though, the light burned out some time ago, albeit with a brief flicker against India last winter. Since the start of the last Ashes series he averaged 108.80 against India and 20.14 against everyone else. Between the start of 2006 and the end of 2008 his average never dropped below 57 but it ended as 51.85 – still highly impressive, but not a reflection of the player that he was at his best. It’s easy to understand why he wanted to carry on after the Ashes series of 2010/11, but he would surely have been better advised to call it a day in triumph after victory over India rather than subjecting himself to a final series. As an unashamed admirer of his cricket, if not always his demeanour, I find that sad and can only hope that history remembers him as it should.
This
is a shame, because I can’t think of many batsmen of the last
thirty-five years that I’ve enjoyed watching more. At his best, and his
best spanned quite a period, he was dismissive of all but the very best
bowling, pulling balls that were only fractionally short and driving
straight with power that seemed entirely incommensurate with the effort
put in. Add his scintillating fielding just about anywhere into the mix
and you have a truly great cricketer, although his greatness, in truth,
never really extended to captaincy. Much of his tenure as captain was a
success but this was as much due to the staggering talent at his
disposal as to any spectacular nous on his part. The 2005 Ashes showed
that his great side lacked a plan B, although the following series in
Australia showed that the plan A had a lot going for it. He was a good
leader of a great side for they, mostly, respected him as a great player
in his own right, but once the retirements started and the side entered
transition he was, understandably, less able to bring the best out of
his side, although it was a challenge that would have tested the
greatest skippers.
In truth, though, the light burned out some time ago, albeit with a brief flicker against India last winter. Since the start of the last Ashes series he averaged 108.80 against India and 20.14 against everyone else. Between the start of 2006 and the end of 2008 his average never dropped below 57 but it ended as 51.85 – still highly impressive, but not a reflection of the player that he was at his best. It’s easy to understand why he wanted to carry on after the Ashes series of 2010/11, but he would surely have been better advised to call it a day in triumph after victory over India rather than subjecting himself to a final series. As an unashamed admirer of his cricket, if not always his demeanour, I find that sad and can only hope that history remembers him as it should.
No comments:
Post a Comment